Extreme poverty
is a more serious problem for the world than climate change, terrorism or the
state of the economy (BBC world service global poll 2010).
Poverty is a
naked reality that can be asserted objectively and fell-subjectively. It is
oldest and yet unresolved social problem (Bradshow, 2006). Historically
speaking, the problems of poverty started with the early formation of human
society. Societies of the past and present are either satisfied between the
slaves and owners, feudal lords and serfs, or the capitalists and the working
class between the “haves” and the “have nots” or “rich” and “poor”. The
opportuned, privileged, educated and sheltered the healthier and secured social
group, while the “poor” are the opposite deprived, depressed and diseased.
(Haralambos, 2004).
Worldwide, the
number of people living in extreme poverty in 2009 in expected to be from
55millon to 90million higher than anticipated before the global economic
crisis, though the impact will vary across regions and countries. Current
projections suggest that overall poverty rates in the developing countries will
still fall in 2002, but at a much more slower pace than before the downturn.
For some countries, this may mean reaching their poverty reduction target. In
sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, both the number of poor and the poverty rate are
expected to increase further in some of the more vulnerable and low-growth
economics (MDGs report 2009).
The report also
observed that prior to the economic crisis and higher food prices, the number
of people in the developing regions living in extreme poverty – on less than
$1.25 a day in 1990 will increase to 1.4 million in 2005. As a result, those
considered extremely poor accounted for slightly more than a quarter of the
developing world’s population in 2005, compared to almost half in 1990.
There was a
dramatic fall in the poverty rate in Eastern Asia – thanks, in large part to
rapid economic growth in China, which helped lift 474 million people from
extreme poverty. Elsewhere, progress has been slower and, in some regions
growing population have caused the ranks of the destitute. To swell.
Sub-Saharan Africa counted 100million more extreme poor people in 2005 than in
1990. And the poverty rate remained above 50 percent (though it had began to
decline after 1999). Globally, the target of reducing the poverty rate by half
by 2015 seems likely to be achieved. However, some regions will fall far short,
and as many as 1million people are likely to remain in extreme poverty by the
target date.
According to the
World Bank (2008), the developing world is poor than we thought, but no less
successful in the fight against poverty. Shaohua c, (2008) argues that 95
percent of developing world’s population lived on less than $10 a day. Using
2005 population numbers this is equivalent to just under 79.7 percent of world
population and does not include population living on less than $10 a day from
industrialized countries.
With the
population estimated at about 140 million, Nigeria is the largest country in Africa
and one-sixth of the black population in the world. It is the 8th
largest deposit of natural gas in the world. There are also abundant solid
mineral deposits that remained largely untapped. Currently, barely 40percent of
its arable land is under cultivation with over 100 tertiary institutions
producing more than 200,000 graduates per annum (soludo, 2006). Starting as it
may be, about two-thirds of Nigerian people are poor, yet Nigeria is a country
with vast potential wealth. Although revenues, from crude oil have been
increasing over the past decades, our people have been falling deeper into
poverty (chukwuemeka, 2009).
As far back as
1980, an estimated 27 percent of Nigerians lived in poverty. By 1999 about 70
percent of the population had income of less than S1 a day and the figure has
risen since then (NEEDS, 2005). Poverty levels vary across the country, with
the highest proportion of poor people in the North-west and North-east as 77.7
percent and 76.3 percent respectively. And the South–west recorded the lowest.
With 59.1 percent. Sokoto had the highest at 81.2 percent, while Niger had the
lowest at 33.8 percent during the review period (Kunle, 2010). The classical
example to underscore the scope of misfortune is to compare Nigeria with
Indonesia and even Malaysia. By 1972 before Nigeria and Indonesia had the first
oil boom contends, both countries were comparable in almost all spheres:
agrarian societies, multi–ethnic and religious societies, with comparable size
of GDP, etc (chukwuemeka, 2009). In the same vein, both Nigeria and Indonesia
experienced oil boom in 1973 and thereafter, took different policy choices. The
outcomes of the differences in policy, regimes are such much that today, while
manufactures as percentage of total exports is about 40 percent in Indonesia,
it is less than 1 percent in Nigeria where we were in 1970s. It will be
recalled that even Malaysia that has overtaken Nigeria got her first palm
seedlings from Nigeria in the early 1960s, when oil palm produce was already a
major export of Nigeria. In the 1990s. It was said that Malaysia’s export of
palm oil produce earned it more than Nigeria earned oil exports (soludo, 2006).
Nigeria emerged
from colonial states as a poor country. Her situation is weakened by poverty,
disease and ignorance. Poverty in Nigeria is multi–selected, multi–dimensional
and multi–disciplinary. The Nigerian economy until recently has been
characterized by the paradox of growth without poverty reduction and the tickle
down effect of growth or the poor, slow response of government to the endemic
and persistent of poverty and poor governance.
Poverty as far
as the Nigerian society is concerned, is an endemic disease that has refused to
respond positively to all prescriptions and treatments offered by “economic and
political surgeons” since independence. We also observed in the face of these
numerous policies, strategies and programmers put in place with the major aim
of alleviating poverty in the country that, the gap between the rich and the
power is widening, giving rise to chronic hunger, per capita income dwindling,
unemployment condition worsening, inflation rate skyrocketing and the general
socio-economic welfare of the majority deteriorating on daily basis (Goshit,
2004).
The fight
against poverty has been a central plank of development planning since
independence in 1960 and about fifteen ministries, fourteen specialized
agencies, and nineteen donor agencies, and non-governmental organizations have
been involved in the decades of this crusade but about 70 percent of Nigerians
still live in poverty (soludo, 2003:27). Observers have unanimously agreed that
successive government interventions have failed to achieved the objectives for
which they were established (Ovwasa, 2000: 73; Adesopo, 2008: 219 – 222; Omotola,
2008: 505 – 512). The failure to effectively combat the problem has largely
been blamed on infrastructural decay, endemic corruption, and poor governance
and accountability (Okonjo – Iweala, Soludo and Mukhtar, 2003:1).
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment here!